We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to your civil servant without the actual duration of service just about violates the entire service structure as a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention in the law nor with the equity. Read more
In that sense, case law differs from one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in New York would not be decided using case regulation from California. Alternatively, New York courts will assess the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions on the issue exist, The big apple courts could possibly check out precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors including how outdated the decision is and also the closeness to your facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common law.
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only completed In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden supplied to any reported judgment may possibly rely on the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[7]
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws with the United States and this State.
Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue advice with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges website after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down with the Supreme Court within the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority of your parent department on the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount in the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Any court may seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Criminal cases Inside the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil law systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.